https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77935 The Committee found the failure to impose a penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, on the assessee for a shortage of excisable goods to be incorrect, directing the Joint Commissioner to appeal before CESTAT. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to proper procedures for filing appeals, citing concerns over lack of transparency in authorization processes. Revenue's appeals were dismissed for not following established legal procedures, underscoring the significance of legal compliance in such matters to protect public interest and ensure validity. en-us Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77935 The Committee found the failure to impose a penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, on the assessee for a shortage of excisable goods to be incorrect, directing the Joint Commissioner to appeal before CESTAT. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to proper procedures for filing appeals, citing concerns over lack of transparency in authorization processes. Revenue's appeals were dismissed for not following established legal procedures, underscoring the significance of legal compliance in such matters to protect public interest and ensure validity. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77935