<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 425 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the department&#039;s decision to adjust the refund towards interest without a show cause notice, emphasizing that no separate notice is required for such adjustments. The appellant&#039;s argument that the initial payment was made under protest was not accepted, and the Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, citing established legal principles. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the legality of the adjustment and allowing the appellants to pursue the matter of the original payment separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 425 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the department&#039;s decision to adjust the refund towards interest without a show cause notice, emphasizing that no separate notice is required for such adjustments. The appellant&#039;s argument that the initial payment was made under protest was not accepted, and the Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, citing established legal principles. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the legality of the adjustment and allowing the appellants to pursue the matter of the original payment separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>