https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77919 SC held the writ petition was not maintainable where an efficacious statutory remedy existed under Section 35 of FEMA. Allowing a writ despite availability of appeal would permit bypassing statutory conditions (limitation, court fees, deposits or other preconditions). Liability arose from statute, not common law, and must be challenged by the appeal mechanism prescribed by the statute. The HC should not entertain an interlocutory writ that circumvents the statutory appeal route. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77919 SC held the writ petition was not maintainable where an efficacious statutory remedy existed under Section 35 of FEMA. Allowing a writ despite availability of appeal would permit bypassing statutory conditions (limitation, court fees, deposits or other preconditions). Liability arose from statute, not common law, and must be challenged by the appeal mechanism prescribed by the statute. The HC should not entertain an interlocutory writ that circumvents the statutory appeal route. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77919