<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 472 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77902</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the respondent&#039;s claim for refund under the Central Excise Act was not time-barred. The Court found that the refund application was made within the prescribed time limit despite the goods being returned. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial legal issues were raised, affirming the decisions in favor of the respondent by the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 472 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77902</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the respondent&#039;s claim for refund under the Central Excise Act was not time-barred. The Court found that the refund application was made within the prescribed time limit despite the goods being returned. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial legal issues were raised, affirming the decisions in favor of the respondent by the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>