<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77901</link>
    <description>A Government of India undertaking challenged a Tribunal direction requiring pre-deposit of duty and sought substitution with a general bond, relying on exemption notifications and binding Board instructions. The Bombay High Court noted that the Tribunal had not considered the Board instructions and that the petitioner&#039;s solvency was not in doubt. On that basis, the Court found a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and held that the pre-deposit condition could be modified. The Court did not determine the underlying duty liability, leaving the substantive dispute for adjudication, and substituted the pre-deposit requirement with execution of a general bond for the full duty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77901</link>
      <description>A Government of India undertaking challenged a Tribunal direction requiring pre-deposit of duty and sought substitution with a general bond, relying on exemption notifications and binding Board instructions. The Bombay High Court noted that the Tribunal had not considered the Board instructions and that the petitioner&#039;s solvency was not in doubt. On that basis, the Court found a prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit and held that the pre-deposit condition could be modified. The Court did not determine the underlying duty liability, leaving the substantive dispute for adjudication, and substituted the pre-deposit requirement with execution of a general bond for the full duty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>