https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77894 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to remand the case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing that authority was vested in a designated individual, not tied to a specific post as per the 1999 Office Order. The Court directed a temporary halt to proceedings and allowed the petitioner to seek directions from the Central Government for pending Mumbai proceedings, indicating that any new order designating an officer in Mumbai would supersede the Tribunal's decision. The judgment clarified the importance of authority by designation over authority by post and highlighted the role of the Central Government in overseeing such proceedings. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77894 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to remand the case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing that authority was vested in a designated individual, not tied to a specific post as per the 1999 Office Order. The Court directed a temporary halt to proceedings and allowed the petitioner to seek directions from the Central Government for pending Mumbai proceedings, indicating that any new order designating an officer in Mumbai would supersede the Tribunal's decision. The judgment clarified the importance of authority by designation over authority by post and highlighted the role of the Central Government in overseeing such proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77894