<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 520 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77891</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee in a case involving the reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s method of determining the value of shares acquired through amalgamation, leading to the disallowance of the claimed loss on the sale of shares. The court found that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal had erred in allowing the assessee&#039;s claim, ultimately supporting the ITO&#039;s decision in recalculating the profit/loss based on the proportionate value of the shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 520 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77891</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee in a case involving the reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s method of determining the value of shares acquired through amalgamation, leading to the disallowance of the claimed loss on the sale of shares. The court found that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal had erred in allowing the assessee&#039;s claim, ultimately supporting the ITO&#039;s decision in recalculating the profit/loss based on the proportionate value of the shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>