<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 477 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77889</link>
    <description>An importer sought retesting of a seized food sample by the Central Food Laboratory from the sample already held by customs and requested a copy of the analysis report. The dispute was resolved on the parties&#039; agreed position: the respondent accepted that the available sample could be sent for retesting on payment of the prescribed fee, and the petitioner raised no objection. The Court directed retesting of the existing sample and furnishing of the analysis report to the importer, consistent with the administrative instruction relied on by the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 477 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77889</link>
      <description>An importer sought retesting of a seized food sample by the Central Food Laboratory from the sample already held by customs and requested a copy of the analysis report. The dispute was resolved on the parties&#039; agreed position: the respondent accepted that the available sample could be sent for retesting on payment of the prescribed fee, and the petitioner raised no objection. The Court directed retesting of the existing sample and furnishing of the analysis report to the importer, consistent with the administrative instruction relied on by the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>