<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 406 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77887</link>
    <description>The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the interim injunction granted under Order XXXIX Rule 1 C.P.C., vacating the injunction on excise duty payment dispute. The court emphasized the attachment of excisable goods of the succeeding company for recovering dues from the predecessor, critiquing the trial court&#039;s oversight of statutory provisions. Alternative remedies were highlighted, and the appeal outcome favored the appellant, setting aside the injunction and concluding the legal dispute without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 406 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77887</link>
      <description>The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the interim injunction granted under Order XXXIX Rule 1 C.P.C., vacating the injunction on excise duty payment dispute. The court emphasized the attachment of excisable goods of the succeeding company for recovering dues from the predecessor, critiquing the trial court&#039;s oversight of statutory provisions. Alternative remedies were highlighted, and the appeal outcome favored the appellant, setting aside the injunction and concluding the legal dispute without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>