<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 445 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77884</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held unsustainable where Modvat credit on welding electrodes remained a debatable issue and had not been finally settled. The Court noted that several appeals had already arisen on the same question, showing that the underlying credit entitlement was still under dispute. In those circumstances, the basis for imposing penalty did not survive, and deletion of the penalty was justified. The Court also stated that no substantial question of law arose, leaving the assessee entitled to relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 445 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77884</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was held unsustainable where Modvat credit on welding electrodes remained a debatable issue and had not been finally settled. The Court noted that several appeals had already arisen on the same question, showing that the underlying credit entitlement was still under dispute. In those circumstances, the basis for imposing penalty did not survive, and deletion of the penalty was justified. The Court also stated that no substantial question of law arose, leaving the assessee entitled to relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>