<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 260 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77883</link>
    <description>The court directed the release of goods under Section 110A of the Customs Act, setting aside the order rejecting the application for provisional release. The petitioner was required to execute a full value bond and pay 25% of the goods&#039; value as cash security. In a related writ petition, the court instructed the adjudicating authority to conclude proceedings within sixty days of receiving a reply to the show cause notice. The petitioner was granted an extension to respond, with a warning that failure to do so would allow authorities to proceed as per the law. The decision did not address the merits of the adjudication proceedings, and the writ petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 260 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77883</link>
      <description>The court directed the release of goods under Section 110A of the Customs Act, setting aside the order rejecting the application for provisional release. The petitioner was required to execute a full value bond and pay 25% of the goods&#039; value as cash security. In a related writ petition, the court instructed the adjudicating authority to conclude proceedings within sixty days of receiving a reply to the show cause notice. The petitioner was granted an extension to respond, with a warning that failure to do so would allow authorities to proceed as per the law. The decision did not address the merits of the adjudication proceedings, and the writ petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>