<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77873</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant the refund in cash and to allow interest for the period of delay beyond three months from the date of filing the refund application. The single bench was deemed competent to hear the matter, and the refund in cash was justified due to the respondent&#039;s inability to utilize the cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77873</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to grant the refund in cash and to allow interest for the period of delay beyond three months from the date of filing the refund application. The single bench was deemed competent to hear the matter, and the refund in cash was justified due to the respondent&#039;s inability to utilize the cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>