<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 419 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77872</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, affirming penalties imposed on the appellants, including a CHA company and its employees, for their involvement in an illicit export scheme. The penalties were based on evidence showing their knowledge and participation in mis-declaring consignments to claim fraudulent drawbacks. The Tribunal found the penalties justified under Section 114 of the Customs Act, emphasizing the need for compliance with customs regulations to prevent such fraudulent activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 419 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77872</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, affirming penalties imposed on the appellants, including a CHA company and its employees, for their involvement in an illicit export scheme. The penalties were based on evidence showing their knowledge and participation in mis-declaring consignments to claim fraudulent drawbacks. The Tribunal found the penalties justified under Section 114 of the Customs Act, emphasizing the need for compliance with customs regulations to prevent such fraudulent activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>