<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 375 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77865</link>
    <description>The court held that the increased liability due to foreign exchange fluctuation should be treated in the revenue account, aligning with past assessments where similar gains were considered business income. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the consistent treatment of such fluctuations in financial accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 375 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77865</link>
      <description>The court held that the increased liability due to foreign exchange fluctuation should be treated in the revenue account, aligning with past assessments where similar gains were considered business income. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the consistent treatment of such fluctuations in financial accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>