<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 542 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77860</link>
    <description>A revision filed beyond limitation, together with a pending application for condonation of delay, was treated as a pending proceeding for settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The designated authority could not decide whether the revision was time-barred or whether delay should be condoned, because that question belonged to the revisional authority. On that basis, the disputed assessment liability fell within the Scheme&#039;s settlement mechanism, and the declaration was required to be accepted for the tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 542 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77860</link>
      <description>A revision filed beyond limitation, together with a pending application for condonation of delay, was treated as a pending proceeding for settlement under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The designated authority could not decide whether the revision was time-barred or whether delay should be condoned, because that question belonged to the revisional authority. On that basis, the disputed assessment liability fell within the Scheme&#039;s settlement mechanism, and the declaration was required to be accepted for the tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>