https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77844 The High Court of Calcutta, comprising Chief Justice Mohit S. Shah and Justice Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, set aside the dismissal of a writ petition due to the existence of an alternative remedy. The court emphasized that the mere existence of an alternative remedy does not render a writ petition non-maintainable and instructed a fresh hearing on the merits. The court found evidence of improper exercise of jurisdiction and directed the adjudicating authority to expedite proceedings, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a bank guarantee and renewing it as necessary. The interim order would stand vacated in case of non-renewal, with the proceedings ideally concluding within three months. en-us Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77844 The High Court of Calcutta, comprising Chief Justice Mohit S. Shah and Justice Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, set aside the dismissal of a writ petition due to the existence of an alternative remedy. The court emphasized that the mere existence of an alternative remedy does not render a writ petition non-maintainable and instructed a fresh hearing on the merits. The court found evidence of improper exercise of jurisdiction and directed the adjudicating authority to expedite proceedings, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a bank guarantee and renewing it as necessary. The interim order would stand vacated in case of non-renewal, with the proceedings ideally concluding within three months. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77844