<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 470 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77841</link>
    <description>The Court set aside and quashed an order directing a company and its Senior Manager - Taxation to deposit duty and penalty without a hearing or considering the stay application&#039;s contentions. Emphasizing the need for reasoned orders, the Court highlighted the requirement for objective consideration of facts even without a hearing. Citing the evolving concept of natural justice, the Court directed the respondent to reconsider the stay application, ensuring a reasoned order after granting a personal hearing to the petitioners. The Court expressed concern over lack of individual consideration in similar orders by the respondent, disposing of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 470 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77841</link>
      <description>The Court set aside and quashed an order directing a company and its Senior Manager - Taxation to deposit duty and penalty without a hearing or considering the stay application&#039;s contentions. Emphasizing the need for reasoned orders, the Court highlighted the requirement for objective consideration of facts even without a hearing. Citing the evolving concept of natural justice, the Court directed the respondent to reconsider the stay application, ensuring a reasoned order after granting a personal hearing to the petitioners. The Court expressed concern over lack of individual consideration in similar orders by the respondent, disposing of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>