<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 424 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77831</link>
    <description>HC allowed taxpayer&#039;s appeal, holding that cenvat credit for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery is permissible where claimed after the 2000 amendment enabling such credit. The court distinguished an earlier adverse tribunal decision, which related to a pre-amendment period, and found the present case governed by the amended law. The tribunal&#039;s allowance of credit was upheld as justified under the post-2000 statutory regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 424 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77831</link>
      <description>HC allowed taxpayer&#039;s appeal, holding that cenvat credit for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery is permissible where claimed after the 2000 amendment enabling such credit. The court distinguished an earlier adverse tribunal decision, which related to a pre-amendment period, and found the present case governed by the amended law. The tribunal&#039;s allowance of credit was upheld as justified under the post-2000 statutory regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>