<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 18 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77816</link>
    <description>ITAT, MUMBAI held that Section 115JB (MAT) is inapplicable to a banking company because MAT&#039;s computation starts from a profit &amp; loss account prepared under Parts II &amp; III of Schedule VI to the Companies Act, which banks are exempted from under the proviso to Section 211(2); banks prepare final accounts under the Banking Regulation Act. Consequently, reopening the assessment on the ground that MAT had not been applied was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 10:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 18 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77816</link>
      <description>ITAT, MUMBAI held that Section 115JB (MAT) is inapplicable to a banking company because MAT&#039;s computation starts from a profit &amp; loss account prepared under Parts II &amp; III of Schedule VI to the Companies Act, which banks are exempted from under the proviso to Section 211(2); banks prepare final accounts under the Banking Regulation Act. Consequently, reopening the assessment on the ground that MAT had not been applied was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>