<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77811</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s case was not mistakenly listed for hearing again, emphasizing the importance of promptly rectifying court mistakes. Charges for &quot;erection &amp;amp; commissioning&quot; of machinery from July 1997 to September 2001 were found non-taxable as they did not fall under engineering consultancy services. Similarly, &quot;commissioning and installation&quot; charges were also deemed non-taxable. The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. Additionally, in a related appeal, interest on a previous demand was deemed unsustainable, leading to the tribunal&#039;s decision to not levy interest in the present appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77811</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s case was not mistakenly listed for hearing again, emphasizing the importance of promptly rectifying court mistakes. Charges for &quot;erection &amp;amp; commissioning&quot; of machinery from July 1997 to September 2001 were found non-taxable as they did not fall under engineering consultancy services. Similarly, &quot;commissioning and installation&quot; charges were also deemed non-taxable. The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. Additionally, in a related appeal, interest on a previous demand was deemed unsustainable, leading to the tribunal&#039;s decision to not levy interest in the present appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>