<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 476 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that without clearance from the Committee on Disputes, the appeals were not maintainable. As a result, both the appeals and stay applications were dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of resolving disputes involving government entities through designated High Power Committees to reduce litigation and conserve public resources, in line with the Apex Court&#039;s directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 476 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that without clearance from the Committee on Disputes, the appeals were not maintainable. As a result, both the appeals and stay applications were dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of resolving disputes involving government entities through designated High Power Committees to reduce litigation and conserve public resources, in line with the Apex Court&#039;s directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>