<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 403 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal against the rejection of the refund claim, affirming the decision that the Appeal against the letter from the Assistant Commissioner was not maintainable. The issue of the pending show cause notice regarding the demand was raised but did not alter the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 403 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal against the rejection of the refund claim, affirming the decision that the Appeal against the letter from the Assistant Commissioner was not maintainable. The issue of the pending show cause notice regarding the demand was raised but did not alter the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>