<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 428 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77793</link>
    <description>An appeal against refusal to rectify an order-in-original was held not maintainable where the order-in-original itself had not been challenged, so the appellate authority could not examine the merits of the original demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) was also found to have correctly held that the Additional Commissioner had no power to rectify an order-in-original once issued by him, and that no appeal lay in the manner attempted against the rectification order. The appeal and stay petition were therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 428 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77793</link>
      <description>An appeal against refusal to rectify an order-in-original was held not maintainable where the order-in-original itself had not been challenged, so the appellate authority could not examine the merits of the original demand. The Commissioner (Appeals) was also found to have correctly held that the Additional Commissioner had no power to rectify an order-in-original once issued by him, and that no appeal lay in the manner attempted against the rectification order. The appeal and stay petition were therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>