<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 386 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77782</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the undervaluation of closing stock was dismissed as the High Court found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the change in accounting method. The expenses incurred in issuing bonus shares were deemed allowable as revenue expenditure based on a Supreme Court judgment. Additionally, PF/ESIC payments made within the grace period were considered timely and allowed as deductions, in line with precedents from various High Courts. The appeal was ultimately dismissed on all issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 386 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77782</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the undervaluation of closing stock was dismissed as the High Court found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the change in accounting method. The expenses incurred in issuing bonus shares were deemed allowable as revenue expenditure based on a Supreme Court judgment. Additionally, PF/ESIC payments made within the grace period were considered timely and allowed as deductions, in line with precedents from various High Courts. The appeal was ultimately dismissed on all issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>