<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 403 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, vacating the penalty and interest demands imposed for irregularly taking excess credit in their Cenvat account without proper documentation. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unjustified due to lack of evidence of intentional duty evasion. Additionally, the demand for interest was deemed unsustainable as the credit was not utilized, following legal precedents and emphasizing strict adherence to statutory provisions. Consequently, the Tribunal overturned the order confirming the penalty and interest demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 403 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, vacating the penalty and interest demands imposed for irregularly taking excess credit in their Cenvat account without proper documentation. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unjustified due to lack of evidence of intentional duty evasion. Additionally, the demand for interest was deemed unsustainable as the credit was not utilized, following legal precedents and emphasizing strict adherence to statutory provisions. Consequently, the Tribunal overturned the order confirming the penalty and interest demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>