<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 422 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77768</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s stay petition against the waiver of pre-deposit amounts related to Service Tax, interest, and penalties concerning the liability under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; was partially successful. The appellant was directed to deposit a specific amount related to brokerage within four weeks. If the deposit is made, the pre-deposit condition for the remaining amounts is waived, and recovery is stayed until the appeal is resolved. The court noted that the purchase and sale of space in liners favored the appellant based on a previous decision, but further examination is required to determine if the brokerage received constitutes reimbursement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 422 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77768</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s stay petition against the waiver of pre-deposit amounts related to Service Tax, interest, and penalties concerning the liability under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; was partially successful. The appellant was directed to deposit a specific amount related to brokerage within four weeks. If the deposit is made, the pre-deposit condition for the remaining amounts is waived, and recovery is stayed until the appeal is resolved. The court noted that the purchase and sale of space in liners favored the appellant based on a previous decision, but further examination is required to determine if the brokerage received constitutes reimbursement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>