https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77761 The Tribunal held that a finding in an earlier remand order on the CaO-content condition could not be reopened in later remand proceedings when the Department had not challenged that finding. The remand had been limited to examining the remaining requirements under the licence, DEEC scheme and exemption notification, and the original authority had found those other conditions satisfied. Re-agitating the CaO issue would amount to impermissible review of the Tribunal's earlier decision. The Tribunal therefore confined the dispute to the scope of the prior remand and declined to interfere with the Commissioner's order. en-us Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77761 The Tribunal held that a finding in an earlier remand order on the CaO-content condition could not be reopened in later remand proceedings when the Department had not challenged that finding. The remand had been limited to examining the remaining requirements under the licence, DEEC scheme and exemption notification, and the original authority had found those other conditions satisfied. Re-agitating the CaO issue would amount to impermissible review of the Tribunal's earlier decision. The Tribunal therefore confined the dispute to the scope of the prior remand and declined to interfere with the Commissioner's order. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77761