<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 182 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77756</link>
    <description>An 87-day delay in filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was held to be within the condonable period, and the appellate authority was expected to adopt a liberal approach where the explanation, though not fully convincing, showed sufficient cause in the interest of justice. The refusal to condone the delay was set aside, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 182 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77756</link>
      <description>An 87-day delay in filing an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was held to be within the condonable period, and the appellate authority was expected to adopt a liberal approach where the explanation, though not fully convincing, showed sufficient cause in the interest of justice. The refusal to condone the delay was set aside, and the matter was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>