<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 179 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77753</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the fees collected for services provided to the Income Tax department were not subject to service tax under the category of &quot;business auxiliary service.&quot; The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s work did not fall within the definition of &quot;business auxiliary service&quot; as per the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. Additionally, the Tribunal granted the appellant waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery regarding the disputed service tax duties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 179 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77753</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the fees collected for services provided to the Income Tax department were not subject to service tax under the category of &quot;business auxiliary service.&quot; The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s work did not fall within the definition of &quot;business auxiliary service&quot; as per the relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. Additionally, the Tribunal granted the appellant waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery regarding the disputed service tax duties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>