<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 589 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77737</link>
    <description>The High Court held that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal due to the shifting of the assessee&#039;s registered office. The court emphasized that territorial jurisdiction is determined by the location of the Assessing Officer&#039;s office, not the shifting of the assessee&#039;s registered office. The appeal was returned to the appellant with the liberty to approach the High Court having the appropriate jurisdiction, if desired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 589 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77737</link>
      <description>The High Court held that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal due to the shifting of the assessee&#039;s registered office. The court emphasized that territorial jurisdiction is determined by the location of the Assessing Officer&#039;s office, not the shifting of the assessee&#039;s registered office. The appeal was returned to the appellant with the liberty to approach the High Court having the appropriate jurisdiction, if desired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>