<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 392 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77736</link>
    <description>The Court set aside and quashed the order transferring jurisdiction from Kolkata to New Delhi under the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found the transfer decision to be arbitrary and lacking proper communication and consideration of the petitioner&#039;s objections. The Court held that the order was passed perfunctorily, without addressing the petitioner&#039;s submissions adequately. The Revenue was allowed to initiate the process afresh, providing the petitioner with a proper opportunity to present its case. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs, and all parties were directed to act as per the operative part of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 392 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77736</link>
      <description>The Court set aside and quashed the order transferring jurisdiction from Kolkata to New Delhi under the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found the transfer decision to be arbitrary and lacking proper communication and consideration of the petitioner&#039;s objections. The Court held that the order was passed perfunctorily, without addressing the petitioner&#039;s submissions adequately. The Revenue was allowed to initiate the process afresh, providing the petitioner with a proper opportunity to present its case. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs, and all parties were directed to act as per the operative part of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>