<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 413 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77731</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction in writ proceedings may arise where part of the cause of action occurs within the court&#039;s limits, including import-related activity linked to anti-dumping action. Judicial review at the initiation stage is limited, but a threshold challenge is maintainable where the complaint is that the authority lacked statutory jurisdiction. In anti-dumping matters, domestic industry status is essential because an applicant that itself imports the alleged dumped article, or substantial components used in its production, may fall outside the statutory definition. The like-article issue may be examined, but the absence of a valid domestic industry applicant is a decisive jurisdictional defect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 413 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77731</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction in writ proceedings may arise where part of the cause of action occurs within the court&#039;s limits, including import-related activity linked to anti-dumping action. Judicial review at the initiation stage is limited, but a threshold challenge is maintainable where the complaint is that the authority lacked statutory jurisdiction. In anti-dumping matters, domestic industry status is essential because an applicant that itself imports the alleged dumped article, or substantial components used in its production, may fall outside the statutory definition. The like-article issue may be examined, but the absence of a valid domestic industry applicant is a decisive jurisdictional defect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>