https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77724 An adjudication based on a precedent later reversed cannot be sustained where the Tribunal's reasoning depends on that earlier view. The High Court held that the Tribunal's order, which had followed the reversed interpretation of "clearing and forwarding agent" service, required interference because the dispute had to be reconsidered on the basis of the corrected legal position and the facts of the case. The order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77724 An adjudication based on a precedent later reversed cannot be sustained where the Tribunal's reasoning depends on that earlier view. The High Court held that the Tribunal's order, which had followed the reversed interpretation of "clearing and forwarding agent" service, required interference because the dispute had to be reconsidered on the basis of the corrected legal position and the facts of the case. The order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77724