<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 160 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77722</link>
    <description>A constitutional challenge was raised to Section 65(105)(zzzz), as amended, on the levy of service tax on renting of immovable property. The Court held that arguable questions were raised for consideration, issued rule, and granted interim protection against coercive recovery limited to service tax on renting of immovable property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 160 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77722</link>
      <description>A constitutional challenge was raised to Section 65(105)(zzzz), as amended, on the levy of service tax on renting of immovable property. The Court held that arguable questions were raised for consideration, issued rule, and granted interim protection against coercive recovery limited to service tax on renting of immovable property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>