<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 407 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, confirming liability to pay interest for unilateral credit utilization, forfeiture of the facility to pay duty in monthly installments, and adjustment of the refundable amount against outstanding dues. The appeals were dismissed, and the impugned orders were left unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 407 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, confirming liability to pay interest for unilateral credit utilization, forfeiture of the facility to pay duty in monthly installments, and adjustment of the refundable amount against outstanding dues. The appeals were dismissed, and the impugned orders were left unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>