<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 383 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77671</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi addressed the failure to list an appeal for early hearing despite a prior order, leading to an extension of stay for the appellant. The Registry&#039;s failure to schedule the appeal as directed and the lack of follow-up by the Departmental Representative were noted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely action and communication, directing an inquiry into the matter. The judgment stressed procedural compliance and proactive communication to ensure efficient resolution of legal matters. Ultimately, the appeal was fixed for final hearing after the issues were addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 383 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77671</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi addressed the failure to list an appeal for early hearing despite a prior order, leading to an extension of stay for the appellant. The Registry&#039;s failure to schedule the appeal as directed and the lack of follow-up by the Departmental Representative were noted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely action and communication, directing an inquiry into the matter. The judgment stressed procedural compliance and proactive communication to ensure efficient resolution of legal matters. Ultimately, the appeal was fixed for final hearing after the issues were addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>