<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 231 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition of duty and penalty, staying their recovery during the appeal. The judgment clarified that the profit made by the appellant from selling goods could not be considered commission subject to service tax, as excise duty was paid on the full transaction value. This decision highlights the importance of accurate documentation and duty payment in determining tax obligations in complex business arrangements involving multiple entities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 231 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition of duty and penalty, staying their recovery during the appeal. The judgment clarified that the profit made by the appellant from selling goods could not be considered commission subject to service tax, as excise duty was paid on the full transaction value. This decision highlights the importance of accurate documentation and duty payment in determining tax obligations in complex business arrangements involving multiple entities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>