<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 229 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant must pre-deposit a specified amount pending further orders, as they failed to establish a prima facie case for a complete waiver of the service tax amount. The decision emphasized the necessity for a detailed examination of the services provided to determine the applicability of service tax, noting the complexity of categorizing services and the importance of comprehensive evidence and legal arguments in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 229 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant must pre-deposit a specified amount pending further orders, as they failed to establish a prima facie case for a complete waiver of the service tax amount. The decision emphasized the necessity for a detailed examination of the services provided to determine the applicability of service tax, noting the complexity of categorizing services and the importance of comprehensive evidence and legal arguments in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>