<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77660</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, directing the Tribunal to issue notices to both the assessee and the Department for a fresh hearing and disposal of the appeal within four months. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on its merits and highlighted the rights of the assessee to appeal against a revised assessment order if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 168 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77660</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, directing the Tribunal to issue notices to both the assessee and the Department for a fresh hearing and disposal of the appeal within four months. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on its merits and highlighted the rights of the assessee to appeal against a revised assessment order if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>