<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 402 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77655</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the rebate claim should be based on the FOB value of the goods as per Circulars No. 687/3/2003-CX and No. 510/6/2000-CX. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the exchange rate prevailing at the time of clearance for rebate calculations, providing consequential relief to the appellants and clarifying the correct interpretation of the Circulars. The decision highlighted adherence to the provisions of the Central Excise Act in resolving rebate disputes and ensuring fair treatment for exporters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 402 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77655</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the rebate claim should be based on the FOB value of the goods as per Circulars No. 687/3/2003-CX and No. 510/6/2000-CX. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the exchange rate prevailing at the time of clearance for rebate calculations, providing consequential relief to the appellants and clarifying the correct interpretation of the Circulars. The decision highlighted adherence to the provisions of the Central Excise Act in resolving rebate disputes and ensuring fair treatment for exporters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>