<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 414 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77621</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, allowed the stay petition against the waiver of pre-deposit of penalties, as the appellant had already deposited the service tax and interest amounts. The Tribunal considered the liability to service tax under the &quot;Interior Decorator Service&quot; category and decided to stay the recovery of penalties pending the appeal&#039;s resolution. Members M.V. Ravindran and P. Karthikeyan pronounced the judgment in open court, emphasizing transparency in the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 414 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77621</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, allowed the stay petition against the waiver of pre-deposit of penalties, as the appellant had already deposited the service tax and interest amounts. The Tribunal considered the liability to service tax under the &quot;Interior Decorator Service&quot; category and decided to stay the recovery of penalties pending the appeal&#039;s resolution. Members M.V. Ravindran and P. Karthikeyan pronounced the judgment in open court, emphasizing transparency in the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>