<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77611</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, a financially unsound concern, regarding the treatment of product development expenses. The Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of expenses under section 35D was overturned by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the genuineness of the expenditure and the need for consistency in deductions. The Tribunal found no substantial question of law, citing previous court decisions, and imposed costs on the Revenue for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 467 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77611</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, a financially unsound concern, regarding the treatment of product development expenses. The Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance of expenses under section 35D was overturned by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the genuineness of the expenditure and the need for consistency in deductions. The Tribunal found no substantial question of law, citing previous court decisions, and imposed costs on the Revenue for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>