https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77607 The appeal was rejected for being time-barred due to lack of proof of proper service of the order-in-original. The Tribunal found the evidence provided by the Revenue insufficient to confirm delivery to the appellants. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the stay petition, set aside the order, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) to review the appeal as filed within time and in accordance with the law, highlighting the significance of proper service and timely filing in legal proceedings. en-us Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77607 The appeal was rejected for being time-barred due to lack of proof of proper service of the order-in-original. The Tribunal found the evidence provided by the Revenue insufficient to confirm delivery to the appellants. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the stay petition, set aside the order, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) to review the appeal as filed within time and in accordance with the law, highlighting the significance of proper service and timely filing in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77607