https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77581 In a dispute over Cenvat credit on common input services used for both dutiable and exempted goods, the Tribunal held that the applicability of Rule 6 to input services was only prima facie arguable and required fuller examination of the scheme and cited case law. Complete waiver of pre-deposit was therefore not justified at the interim stage. Partial interim relief was granted instead, with a direction to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs and stay of balance pre-deposit and recovery subject to compliance pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77581 In a dispute over Cenvat credit on common input services used for both dutiable and exempted goods, the Tribunal held that the applicability of Rule 6 to input services was only prima facie arguable and required fuller examination of the scheme and cited case law. Complete waiver of pre-deposit was therefore not justified at the interim stage. Partial interim relief was granted instead, with a direction to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs and stay of balance pre-deposit and recovery subject to compliance pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77581