<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 387 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77576</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the interest liability on the respondent for &#039;Cable Operator Services&#039; from August 2002 to September 2005. The Tribunal found that the respondent had paid the entire Service tax liability, Education Cess, and interest after being informed by the authorities. Penalties under Sections 76 and 78 were waived due to the respondent&#039;s lack of awareness as a small cable operator, in line with Section 80 of the Finance Act. However, the Tribunal set aside the order waiving interest liability, directing the respondent to discharge the interest liability determined by the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 387 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77576</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the interest liability on the respondent for &#039;Cable Operator Services&#039; from August 2002 to September 2005. The Tribunal found that the respondent had paid the entire Service tax liability, Education Cess, and interest after being informed by the authorities. Penalties under Sections 76 and 78 were waived due to the respondent&#039;s lack of awareness as a small cable operator, in line with Section 80 of the Finance Act. However, the Tribunal set aside the order waiving interest liability, directing the respondent to discharge the interest liability determined by the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>