<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 422 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77573</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for unreliable accounts in the arrack business, emphasizing the burden of proof on the assessee regarding concealment of income in line with legal precedents and statutory amendments. Despite the appellant&#039;s contentions, the Tribunal confirmed the penalty considering the factual findings and assessment confirmation at all levels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 422 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77573</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for unreliable accounts in the arrack business, emphasizing the burden of proof on the assessee regarding concealment of income in line with legal precedents and statutory amendments. Despite the appellant&#039;s contentions, the Tribunal confirmed the penalty considering the factual findings and assessment confirmation at all levels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>