<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 708 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77569</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision in favor of the respondent-assessee, emphasizing that the method adopted for accounting work-in-progress was fair and reasonable. The Court noted that the profits exceeded 10% and the accounts were properly maintained, supporting the assessee&#039;s position. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude the value of work-in-progress in computing the assessee&#039;s income for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 708 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77569</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision in favor of the respondent-assessee, emphasizing that the method adopted for accounting work-in-progress was fair and reasonable. The Court noted that the profits exceeded 10% and the accounts were properly maintained, supporting the assessee&#039;s position. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude the value of work-in-progress in computing the assessee&#039;s income for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>