<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 397 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77560</link>
    <description>The court upheld the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act for the years 1996-97, 1998-99, 1999-2000, and 2000-2001. It found that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment due to significant discrepancies in construction costs revealed by a valuation report. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the court determined that the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on the valuation report was justified, leading to a remand of the case to the Tribunal for further proceedings within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 397 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77560</link>
      <description>The court upheld the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act for the years 1996-97, 1998-99, 1999-2000, and 2000-2001. It found that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment due to significant discrepancies in construction costs revealed by a valuation report. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the court determined that the Assessing Officer&#039;s reliance on the valuation report was justified, leading to a remand of the case to the Tribunal for further proceedings within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>