<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 365 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77550</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, denied a complete waiver of pre-deposit for service tax, interest, and penalties totaling Rs. 51,47,421 in a stay petition. The issue centered on the taxable value for &#039;Banking and other Financial Services&#039; and &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039;, specifically whether amounts collected for postage and telephone charges should be included. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence for a prima facie case for complete waiver, directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 18,00,000 within eight weeks. Upon compliance, the waiver for the remaining amount was granted, and recovery stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 365 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77550</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, denied a complete waiver of pre-deposit for service tax, interest, and penalties totaling Rs. 51,47,421 in a stay petition. The issue centered on the taxable value for &#039;Banking and other Financial Services&#039; and &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039;, specifically whether amounts collected for postage and telephone charges should be included. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence for a prima facie case for complete waiver, directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 18,00,000 within eight weeks. Upon compliance, the waiver for the remaining amount was granted, and recovery stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>