<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 369 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77547</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision despite disapproval of the handling of the case. Ordinarily, a remand for a fresh decision would be warranted due to the lack of proper discussion on the validity of the assessee&#039;s explanation. However, due to the insignificant amount involved, the Court chose not to intervene but criticized the Tribunal&#039;s handling of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 369 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77547</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision despite disapproval of the handling of the case. Ordinarily, a remand for a fresh decision would be warranted due to the lack of proper discussion on the validity of the assessee&#039;s explanation. However, due to the insignificant amount involved, the Court chose not to intervene but criticized the Tribunal&#039;s handling of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>